Atrial flutter complicating acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): A rare case report.

RATIONALE: This case report addresses a unique instance of atrial flutter complicating acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), contributing a novel addition to the medical literature. The co-occurrence of these conditions sheds light on a rare clinical scenario that requires careful consideration. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient exhibited symptoms of pronounced dyspnea, tachypnea, and hypoxemia. Clinical assessment revealed irregular heart rhythms, notably atrial flutter, alongside characteristic signs of ARDS, including bilateral pulmonary infiltrates and reduced lung compliance. DIAGNOSES AND INTERVENTIONS: After a comprehensive evaluation, the patient was diagnosed with atrial flutter complicating ARDS. Therapeutic measures encompassed antiarrhythmic agents, mechanical ventilation, and targeted ARDS management protocols. The intricate interplay between cardiac and respiratory factors necessitated a multidisciplinary approach. OUTCOMES: Throughout treatment, the patient's respiratory distress gradually improved. Control of the atrial flutter was achieved, and oxygenation levels were restored within acceptable limits. This successful outcome underscores the significance of a well-coordinated treatment strategy in addressing complex cases like this. LESSONS: This case highlights the importance of recognizing and managing the intricate relationship between cardiac arrhythmias such as atrial flutter and respiratory complications like ARDS. The successful management of this patient underscores the value of multidisciplinary collaboration and tailored therapeutic interventions. Practitioners should remain vigilant for such rare complications and consider this case a reminder of the potential complexities that can arise in critical care scenarios.

Cardiovascular Disease: Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in adults, with lifetime rates of 21% to 33%. There are numerous risk factors, including older age, hypertension, coronary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, diabetes, and others. Patients engaging in lifelong high-endurance exercise also have increased risk. Some organizations recommend screening; others do not. However, many patients identify AF themselves using mobile cardiac monitoring devices, some of which accurately detect the arrhythmia. Patients with AF with hemodynamic instability are treated with immediate synchronized cardioversion. Treatment options for stable patients include scheduled cardioversion, rhythm control with pharmacotherapy, catheter ablation, and rate control with pharmacotherapy. Catheter ablation is increasingly used as first-line therapy, with up to 80% of patients remaining AF-free after one or two ablation treatments, an outcome superior to that with pharmacotherapy. Patients with AF should receive anticoagulation based on the CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age 75 years or older [doubled], Diabetes, prior Stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism [doubled], Vascular disease, Age 65 to 74 years, Sex category) score, and also before and immediately after ablation or cardioversion. It is uncertain whether long-term anticoagulation is needed after successful ablation. Atrial flutter (AFL) is the second most common sustained supraventricular arrhythmia. Patients with AFL are at risk of developing AF, and many recommendations for managing AFL are similar to those for AF. The preferred management for AFL is catheter ablation, with success rates exceeding 90%.

Predictors of Transthoracic Impedance in Patients Who Underwent Elective Electrical Cardioversion.

Successful synchronized direct current cardioversion (DCCV) requires adequate current delivery to the heart. However, adequate current for successful DCCV has not yet been established. Transmyocardial current depends on 2 factors: input energy and transthoracic impedance (TTI). Although factors affecting TTI have been studied in animal models, factors affecting TTI in humans have not been well established. Herein, we explored the potential factors that affect TTI in humans. A retrospective review of patients who underwent DCCV at a large quaternary medical center between October 2019 and August 2021 was conducted. Pertinent clinical information, including demographics, echocardiography findings, laboratory findings, and body characteristics, was collected. Cardioversion details, including joules delivered and TTI, were recorded by the defibrillator for each patient's first shock. Predictors of thoracic impedance were assessed using regression analysis. A total of 220 patients (29% women) were included in the analysis; 143 of the patients (65%) underwent DCCV for atrial fibrillation and 77 (35%) underwent DCCV for atrial flutter. The mean impedance in our population was 73 ± 18 Ω. In a regression model with high impedance defined as the upper quartile of our cohort, body mass index (BMI), female sex, obstructive sleep apnea, and chronic kidney disease (all p values <0.05) were significantly associated with high impedance. According to a receiver operating characteristic analysis, BMI has a high predictive value for high impedance, with an area under the curve of 0.76. In conclusion, our study reveals that elevated BMI, female sex, sleep apnea, and chronic kidney disease were predictors of higher TTI. These factors may help determine the appropriate initial shock energy in patients who underwent DCCV for atrial fibrillation and flutter.

Clinical Outcomes of Decompensated Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Admissions With or Without Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter.

The aim of our retrospective study is to determine the influence of co-morbid atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) on decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF) admissions using data from the 2020 nationwide inpatient sample. We identified 76,835 adults admitted nonelectively with decompensated CHF. After multivariate adjustment, we found decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) admissions with AF had 37% higher odds of in-hospital mortality, (OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.1-1.72] P < 0.01), 33% higher odds for mechanical ventilation (MV) (OR 1.33 [95% CI 1.14-1.55] P < 0.01), 39% higher odds of early MV (OR 1.39 [95% CI 1.16-1.66] P < 0.01), 54% higher odds of cardiogenic shock (OR 1.54 [95% CI 1.29-1.84] P < 0.01), 61% increased odds of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) requirement (OR 1.61 [95% CI 1.12-2.31] P < 0.02), significantly higher odds of acute renal failure (AKI) necessitating dialysis (OR 2.20 [95% CI 1.39-2.48] P < 0.01), 1-day increase in mean length of stay (LOS) (6.7 vs 5.7 days, adjusted difference: 0.99, P < 0.01), $13,281 increase in total hospitalization charges ($84,316 vs $74,279, adjusted difference: $13,281, P < 0.05) compared to the non-AF cohort. Moreover, we found decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) admissions with AF had a 23% increased odds of MV (OR 1.23 [95% CI 1.01-1.50] P < 0.01), 24% higher odds of early MV (OR 1.24 [95% CI 1.00-1.53] P < 0.01), 0.36 days increase in mean LOS (5.5 vs 5.2 days, adjusted difference: 0.36, P = < 0.01), but no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (OR 1.23 [95% CI 0.86-1.75] P = 0.25), cardiogenic shock (OR 1.75 [95% CI 0.96-3.19] P < 0.07), dialysis-dependent AKI (OR 0.46 [95% CI 0.18-1.17] P < 0.10), or mean total hospitalization charges ($52,086 vs $47,990, adjusted difference: $5584, P = 0.06) compared to the non-AF cohort.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of atrial flutter in neonates.

BACKGROUND: Atrial flutter is an uncommon arrhythmia that can cause severe morbidity, including heart failure and even death in refractory cases. This study investigated the clinical characteristics, treatment, and long-term outcomes of patients with neonatal atrial flutter and its association with heart failure. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed atrial flutter cases observed in our center between 1999 and 2021 and analyzed the clinical characteristics, treatment, and recurrence according to the presence of heart failure. RESULTS: The study comprised 15 patients with atrial flutter, with median bodyweight and gestational age of 2.7 kg, 37+4 weeks, respectively. Twelve patients were diagnosed with atrial flutter on the first day of life. The median atrial and ventricular rates were 440/min, 220/min, respectively. Four patients exhibited congestive heart failure. Episodic recurrence was noted in five patients and occurred at a higher rate in patients with congestive heart failure (p = 0.004). Antiarrhythmic drugs for maintenance treatment were administered more often in patients with heart failure (p = 0.011). Initial treatment included direct current cardioversion (n = 9), digoxin (n = 4), and observation (n = 2). Four patients treated with cardioversion experienced recurrence during the neonatal period, and none of those treated with digoxin experienced recurrence. The median follow-up duration was 7 years, during which no atrial flutter recurrence was evident. CONCLUSION: Neonates with congestive heart failure had a higher recurrence of atrial flutter. Direct current cardioversion is the most reliable treatment for neonatal atrial flutter, whereas digoxin may be a viable treatment option in refractory and recurrent cases.

Transition mechanisms from atrial flutter to atrial fibrillation during anti-tachycardia pacing therapy.

BACKGROUND: Atrial anti-tachycardia pacing (aATP) has been shown to be effective for the termination of atrial tachyarrhythmias, but its success rate is still not high enough. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to investigate the mechanisms of atrial flutter (AFL) termination by aATP and the transition from AFL to atrial fibrillation (AF) during aATP. METHODS: We developed a multi-scale model of the human atrium based on magnetic resonance images and examined the atrial electrophysiology of AFL during aATP with a ramp protocol. RESULTS: In successful cases of aATP, paced excitation entered the excitable gap and collided with the leading edge of the reentrant wave front. Furthermore, the excitation propagating in the opposite direction collided with the trailing edge of the reentrant wave to terminate AFL. The second collision was made possible by the distribution of the wave propagation velocity in the atria. The detailed analysis revealed that the slowing of propagation velocity occurred at the exit of the sub-Eustachian isthmus, probably due to source-sink mismatch. During the transition from AFL to AF, the excitation collided with the refractory zone of the preceding wave and broke into multiple wave fronts to induce AF. A similar observation was made for the transition from AF to sinus rhythm. In both cases, the complex anatomy of the atria played an essential role. CONCLUSION: The complex anatomy of atria plays an essential role in the maintenance of stable AFL and its termination by aATP, which were revealed by the realistic three-dimensional simulation model.

Right atrial dysfunction is associated with atrial arrhythmias in adults with repaired tetralogy of fallot.

BACKGROUND: Adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) have right atrial (RA) remodeling and dysfunction, and RA function can be measured using speckle tracking echocardiography. There are limited data about the role of RA strain imaging for risk stratification in this population. We hypothesized that RA reservoir strain can identify TOF patients at risk of developing atrial arrhythmia. To test this hypothesis, we assessed the relationship between RA reservoir strain and atrial arrhythmias in adults with repaired TOF. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study of adults with repaired TOF, and no prior history of atrial arrhythmias. Atrial arrhythmia was defined as atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia, and categorized as new-onset versus recurrent atrial arrhythmias. RESULTS: We identified 426 patients (age 33 ± 12 years; males 208 (49%)) that met the inclusion criteria. The mean RA reservoir strain, conduit strain, and booster strain were 34 ± 11%, 20 ± 9%, and 15 ± 12%, respectively. Of 426 patients, 73 (17%) developed new-onset atrial arrhythmias (atrial flutter/tachycardia n = 42; atrial fibrillation n = 31); annual incidence 1.9%. RA reservoir strain was associated with new-onset atrial arrhythmias (adjusted HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97) after multivariable adjustment. Of 73 patients with new-onset atrial arrhythmia, 41 (56%) had recurrent atrial arrhythmia (atrial flutter/tachycardia n = 18; atrial fibrillation n = 23); annual incidence 11.2%. Similarly, RA reservoir strain was associated with recurrent atrial arrhythmias (adjusted HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.96) after multivariable adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: RA strain indices can identify patients at risk for atrial arrhythmias, and this can in turn, be used to guide the type/intensity of therapy in such patients.

Pathophysiology and treatment of adults with arrhythmias in the emergency department, part 1: Atrial arrhythmias.

PURPOSE: This article, the first in a 2-part review, aims to reinforce current literature on the pathophysiology of cardiac arrhythmias and various evidence-based treatment approaches and clinical considerations in the acute care setting. Part 1 of this series focuses on atrial arrhythmias. SUMMARY: Arrhythmias are prevalent throughout the world and a common presenting condition in the emergency department (ED) setting. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide and expected to increase in prevalence. Treatment approaches have evolved over time with advances in catheter-directed ablation. Based on historic trials, heart rate control has been the long-standing accepted outpatient treatment modality for AF, but the use of antiarrhythmics is often still indicated for AF in the acute setting, and ED pharmacists should be prepared and poised to help in AF management. Other atrial arrhythmias include atrial flutter (AFL), atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), which warrant distinction due to their unique pathophysiology and because each requires a different approach to utilization of antiarrhythmics. Atrial arrhythmias are typically associated with greater hemodynamic stability than ventricular arrhythmias but still require nuanced management according to patient subset and risk factors. Since antiarrhythmics can also be proarrhythmic, they may destabilize the patient due to adverse effects, many of which are the focus of black-box label warnings that can be overreaching and limit treatment options. Electrical cardioversion for atrial arrhythmias is generally successful and, depending on the setting and/or hemodynamics, often indicated. CONCLUSION: Atrial arrhythmias arise from a variety of mechanisms, and appropriate treatment depends on various factors. A firm understanding of physiological and pharmacological concepts serves as a foundation for exploring evidence supporting agents, indications, and adverse effects in order to provide appropriate care for patients.

Clinical decision support to Optimize Care of patients with Atrial Fibrillation or flutter in the Emergency department: protocol of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized pragmatic trial (O'CAFÉ trial).

BACKGROUND: Management of adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter in the emergency department (ED) includes rate reduction, cardioversion, and stroke prevention. Different approaches to these components of care may lead to variation in frequency of hospitalization and stroke prevention actions, with significant implications for patient experience, cost of care, and risk of complications. Standardization using evidence-based recommendations could reduce variation in management, preventable hospitalizations, and stroke risk. METHODS: We describe the rationale for our ED-based AF treatment recommendations. We also describe the development of an electronic clinical decision support system (CDSS) to deliver these recommendations to emergency physicians at the point of care. We implemented the CDSS at three pilot sites to assess feasibility and solicit user feedback. We will evaluate the impact of the CDSS on hospitalization and stroke prevention actions using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial across 13 community EDs in Northern California. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that the CDSS intervention will reduce hospitalization of adults with isolated AF or atrial flutter presenting to the ED and increase anticoagulation prescription in eligible patients at the time of ED discharge and within 30 days. If our hypotheses are confirmed, the treatment protocol and CDSS could be recommended to other EDs to improve management of adults with AF or atrial flutter. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05009225 .  Registered on 17 August 2021.

Diagnosis and management of patients who present with narrow complex tachycardia in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: While narrow complex tachycardia (NCT) is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED), little is known about its incidence in the ED or about emergency physician expertise in its diagnosis and management. We sought to compare cases of NCT due to primary arrhythmias to those with a rapid heart rate secondary to a medical issue, as well as to determine the accuracy of ED physician diagnosis and appropriateness of treatment. METHODS: We conducted a health records review at a large academic hospital ED staffed by 95 physicians and included consecutive adult patients over 7 months (2020-2021) with NCT (heart rate ≥ 130 bpm and QRS < 120 ms). Cases were reviewed for accuracy of ECG diagnosis and for correctness of treatment as per guidelines by an adjudication committee. RESULTS: We identified 310 ED visits (0.8% of all ED visits), mean age 65.1 years, 52.6% female. Primary arrhythmias accounted for 54.8%. ED physicians correctly interpreted 86.6% of ECGs. The most common arrhythmias and accuracy of ED physician ECG interpretation were atrial fibrillation 44.5% (95.1%), sinus tachycardia 24.2% (90.5%), atrial flutter 15.8% (61.5%), and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) 12.9% (81.6%). Treatments were judged optimal in 96.5% of primary NCT and 99.3% in secondary NCT. Treatments were suboptimal for failure to reduce heart rate < 100 bpm prior to discharge in 2.1% of primary cases and failure to treat underlying cause in 0.7% of secondary cases. CONCLUSION: NCT was found in 0.8% of all ED visits, with more being primary NCT. ED physicians correctly interpreted 86.6% of ECGs but had difficulty differentiating atrial flutter and SVT. They implemented appropriate care in most cases but sometimes failed to adequately control heart rate or to treat the underlying condition, suggesting opportunities to improve care of NCT in the ED.

RéSUMé: INTRODUCTION: Bien que la tachycardie à complexe QRS étroite (narrow complex tachycardia [NCT]) soit une présentation courante au service des urgences (SU), on sait peu de choses sur son incidence dans le SU ou sur l'expertise des médecins urgentistes dans son diagnostic et sa prise en charge. Nous avons cherché à comparer les cas de NCT dus à des arythmies primaires à ceux avec une fréquence cardiaque rapide secondaire à un problème médical, ainsi que pour déterminer l'exactitude du diagnostic de médecin ED et la pertinence du traitement. MéTHODES: Nous avons effectué un examen des dossiers médicaux dans les urgences d'un grand hôpital universitaire où travaillent 95 médecins et avons inclus des patients adultes consécutifs sur 7 mois (2020-2021) présentant une NCT (fréquence cardiaque ≥ 130 bpm et QRS < 120 ms). Les cas ont été examinés par un comité d'adjudication pour vérifier l'exactitude du diagnostic ECG et la justesse du traitement conformément aux directives. RéSULTATS: Nous avons recensé 310 visites aux urgences (0,8 % de toutes les visites aux urgences), l'âge moyen étant de 65,1 ans, 52,6 % de femmes. Les arythmies primaires représentaient 54,8 %. Les médecins urgentistes ont correctement interprété 86,6 % des ECG. Les arythmies les plus fréquentes et la précision de l'interprétation de l'ECG par le médecin de l'urgence étaient la fibrillation auriculaire 44,5 % (95,1 %), la tachycardie sinusale 24,2 % (90,5 %), le flutter auriculaire 15,8 % (61,5 %) et la tachycardie supraventriculaire (TSV) 12,9 % (81,6 %). Les traitements ont été jugés optimaux dans 96,5 % des NCT primaires et 99,3 % des NCT secondaires. Les traitements étaient sous-optimaux en raison de l'incapacité à réduire la fréquence cardiaque < 100 bpm avant la sortie de l'hôpital dans 2,1 % des cas primaires et de l'incapacité à traiter la cause sous-jacente dans 0,7 % des cas secondaires. CONCLUSION: Une NCT a été constatée dans 0,8 % de toutes les visites aux urgences, la plupart étant des NCT primaires. Les médecins des services d'urgence ont interprété correctement 86,6 % des ECG mais ont eu des difficultés à différencier le flutter auriculaire et la TSV. Ils ont mis en œuvre des soins appropriés dans la plupart des cas, mais n'ont parfois pas réussi à contrôler adéquatement la fréquence cardiaque ou à traiter l'affection sous-jacente, ce qui laisse entrevoir des possibilités d'améliorer la prise en charge des NCT aux urgences.

Atrial tachyarrhythmias after lung transplantation in children: A common occurrence.

BACKGROUND: Atrial arrhythmia's (AA) following lung transplant in adults are a well-described clinical finding. In pediatrics, however, there are limited data with some reports suggesting that arrhythmias are rare. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective review of lung transplant recipients from January 2013 to June 2020. A detailed evaluation of clinical characteristics, presence of arrhythmias, and outcomes was completed. Arrhythmias were documented based on inpatient telemetry or remote Holter monitoring. Analyses assessing risk factors for arrhythmias and associations with clinical outcomes were performed. RESULTS: Ninety-one lung transplants were performed in 90 patients. Post-operative AA occurred following 19% transplants. Ectopic atrial tachycardia was seen in 14%, atrial flutter in 2%, and a combination in 2%. The majority of these arrhythmias occurred within the first 45 days post-operatively. Antiarrhythmic treatment was required in 59%, but none required ablation or electrical cardioversion. In patients followed for a year or more, 88% had resolution of their arrhythmia. Arrhythmias were not associated with mortality. In further analysis, however, the presence of arrhythmia was associated with an increased length of ICU stay (median of 12 days (IQR 6, 23) versus 5 days (IQR 4, 9); p = .019) and overall length of hospital stay (median of 26 days (IQR 19, 36) versus 17 days (IQR 19, 36); p = .043). CONCLUSIONS: Atrial tachyarrhythmias after lung transplantation are common in the pediatric population and usually occur early. Although they frequently require medical therapy and are associated with longer stays, there is no associated increased mortality. In addition, the arrhythmias typically self-resolve.

Atrial flutter and fibrillation in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in the ASPIRE registry: Comparison of rate versus rhythm control approaches.

BACKGROUND: The development of atrial flutter and fibrillation (AFL/AF) in patients with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension has been associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Rate and rhythm control strategies have not been directly compared. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) with new-onset AFL/AF were identified in the ASPIRE registry. First, baseline characteristics and rates of sinus rhythm (SR) restoration of 3 arrhythmia management strategies (rate control, medical rhythm control and DC cardioversion, DCCV) in an early (2009-13) and later (2014-19) cohort were compared. Longer-term outcomes in patients who achieved SR versus those who did not were then explored. RESULTS: Sixty (71%) patients had AFL and 24 (29%) AF. Eighteen (22%) patients underwent rate control, 22 (26%) medical rhythm control and 44 (52%) DCCV. SR was restored in 33% treated by rate control, 59% medical rhythm control and 95% DCCV (p < 0.001). Restoration of SR was associated with greater improvement in functional class (FC) and Incremental Shuttle Walk Distance (p both <0.05). It also independently predicted superior survival (3-year survival 62% vs 23% in those remaining in AFL/AF, p < 0.0001). In addition, FC III/IV independently predicted higher mortality (HR 2.86, p = 0.007). Right atrial area independently predicted AFL/AF recurrence (OR 1.08, p = 0.01). DCCV was generally well tolerated with no immediate major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Restoration of SR is associated with superior functional improvement and survival in PAH/CTEPH compared with rate control. DCCV is generally safe and is more effective than medical therapy at achieving SR.

Atrial flutter without structural heart disease in pediatrics: a retrospective review of cases in the Hospital Infantil Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.

BACKGROUND: Atrial flutter is a rare condition in pediatrics that usually occurs as a late complication after surgery for congenital heart diseases, although it can also appear in structurally normal hearts. CLINICAL CASES: We conducted a retrospective study of cases of atrial flutter with no structural heart disease diagnosed in a pediatric population (between 0 and 15 years of age) during 2015-2021 in a tertiary hospital. A total of seven cases were diagnosed, with a clear predominance of males (6/7). Of the seven patients, five debuted in the perinatal period: two were diagnosed at 20 and 36 hours of life, and three, prenatally. Among these perinatal cases, more than half (3/5) were preterm. The treatment was electrical cardioversion. The evolution was satisfactory in these cases, and there were no tachycardias in their subsequent development. In contrast, when the debut occurred at a later age (5-7 years), it was associated with channelopathy (Brugada syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia), and electrical ablation of the ectopic focus was required due to poor response to pharmacological treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the low incidence of this pathology in pediatrics and the benignity and good prognosis of neonatal flutter in most cases. The prognosis worsens when atrial flutter is diagnosed in older children, and the probability of concomitant associated heart disease increases.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El flutter o aleteo auricular es una patología poco frecuente en pediatría que suele presentarse como complicación tardía tras la cirugía de cardiopatías congénitas, aunque también puede aparecer en corazones estructuralmente normales. CASOS CLÍNICOS: Se llevó a cabo un estudio retrospectivo de los casos de flutter auricular sin cardiopatía estructural diagnosticados en una población pediátrica (entre 0 y 15 años de edad) durante el periodo 2015-2021 en un hospital terciario. En total fueron diagnosticados siete casos, con un claro predominio de varones (6/7). De los siete, cinco debutaron en periodo perinatal: dos fueron diagnosticados a las 20 y 36 horas de vida y tres de ellos, prenatalmente. Entre estos casos perinatales, más de la mitad (3/5) fueron pretérmino. El tratamiento fue la cardioversión eléctrica. La evolución fue satisfactoria en estos casos, y no se presentaron taquicardias en su evolución posterior. Por el contrario, cuando el debut se produjo en edades posteriores (5-7 años), se asoció con canalopatía (síndrome de Brugada y taquicardia ventricular polimorfa catecolaminérgica) que requirió de una ablación eléctrica del foco ectópico por escasa respuesta al tratamiento farmacológico. CONCLUSIONES: En este trabajo se confirma la baja incidencia de esta patología en pediatría, además de la benignidad y el buen pronóstico de flutter neonatal en la mayoría de casos. Cuando el diagnóstico se realiza en niños mayores, el pronóstico empeora, y aumenta la probabilidad de presentar de forma concomitante cardiopatías asociadas.

Effect of specialist consultation on emergency department revisits among patients with uncomplicated recent-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between specialist consultation and risk of 30-day ED revisit in emergency department (ED) patients with recent-onset uncomplicated atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF/AFL). METHODS: As a secondary analysis of a previously published trial, clinical experts identified predictors of consultation including age and sex, ED sinus conversion, thromboembolic risk, heart rate, rate control medication use, coronary artery disease and anti-platelet use, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These were included in a propensity-matched hierarchical Bayesian model accounting for hospital site as a random effect, with 30-day ED revisit as the primary outcome. We also measured ED length of stay for consulted and non-consulted patients. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 11 sites for 829 ED patients with AF/AFL, of whom 364 (44%) had specialist consultation. A total of 128 patients (15.4%) had an ED revisit, 78 (16.8%) from the no consult group and 50 (13.7%) from the consult group. Consultation rates ranged from 8.8 to 71% between sites. Median length of stay was 591 min (interquartile range [IQR] 359-1024) for consulted patients and 300 min (IQR 212-409) for patients without consultation. After propensity-matching, consulted patients had a 0.6% (IQR - 4 to 3%) lower risk of 30-day revisits than non-consulted patients (probability of lower risk 55%). CONCLUSIONS: In ED patients with uncomplicated AF/AFL, there was substantial between-site variation in specialist consultations; such consultation was unlikely to influence revisits within 30 days while ED length of stay was nearly double. ED specialist consultations may not be necessary for uncomplicated patients.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Examiner l'association entre la consultation d'un spécialiste et le risque d'une nouvelle visite aux urgences à 30 jours chez les patients des urgences souffrant de fibrillation auriculaire ou de flutter non compliqué d'apparition récente (FA/AFL). MéTHODES: Dans le cadre d'une analyse secondaire d'un essai précédemment publié, des experts cliniques ont identifié les facteurs prédictifs de la consultation, notamment l'âge et le sexe, la conversion sinusale des urgences, le risque thromboembolique, la fréquence cardiaque, l'utilisation de médicaments pour contrôler la fréquence cardiaque, la maladie coronarienne et l'utilisation d'antiplaquettaires, et la maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique. Ceux-ci ont été inclus dans un modèle bayésien hiérarchique apparié en fonction de la propension, qui tient compte du site de l'hôpital comme effet aléatoire, le critère principal étant le retour aux urgences à 30 jours. Nous avons également mesuré la durée de séjour aux urgences des patients consultés et non consultés. RéSULTATS: Nous avons analysé les données de 11 sites pour 829 patients du service d'urgence atteints de FA/AFL, dont 364 (44 %) avaient consulté un spécialiste. Un total de 128 patients (15,4 %) ont eu une nouvelle visite à l'urgence, 78 (16,8 %) du groupe sans consultation et 50 (13,7 %) du groupe de consultation. Les taux de consultation variaient de 8,8 % à 71 % selon les sites. La durée médiane du séjour était de 591 minutes (intervalle interquartile [IQR] 359-1024) pour les patients consultés et de 300 min (IQR 212-409) pour les patients sans consultation. Après appariement par propension, les patients consultés avaient un risque inférieur de 0,6 % (IQR -4 % à 3 %) de revisites à 30 jours par rapport aux patients non consultés (probabilité de risque inférieur de 55 %). CONCLUSIONS: Chez les patients des urgences atteints de FA/AFL non compliquée, il y avait une variation substantielle entre les sites dans les consultations de spécialistes ; il était peu probable qu'une telle consultation influence les visites dans les 30 jours alors que la durée du séjour aux urgences était presque le double. Les consultations de spécialistes des urgences peuvent ne pas être nécessaires pour les patients sans complication.

Increased Body Mass Index and Risk of Left Atrial Thrombus in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients-Data from the Left Atrial Thrombus on Transesophageal Echocardiography (LATTEE) Registry.

An increased body mass index (BMI) is associated with a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and a higher risk of thromboembolic complications in AF patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of BMI on the risk of left atrial thrombi (LATs) in patients with nonvalvular AF/atrial flutter (AFl) (NV AF/AFl). Patients diagnosed with NVAF/AFl (between November 2018 and May 2020) were selected from the multicenter, prospective, observational Left Atrial Thrombus on Transesophageal Echocardiography (LATTEE) registry that included AF/AFl patients referred for cardioversion or ablation followed by transesophageal echocardiography. A total of 2816 AF/AFl patients (63.6% males; mean age 65.8 years; mean BMI 29.8 kg/m2) were included in the study. Two hundred and twenty-two of them (7.9%) had LATs. Compared with normal-weight patients, those with BMIs ≥ 25 kg/m2 more frequently presented clinical factors potentially provoking LATs, such as non-paroxysmal AF/AFl (p = 0.04), hypertension (p < 0.001), and diabetes (p < 0.001); had higher CHA2DS2 scores (p < 0.001); and had larger LA dimensions (LA diameter and LA area) (p < 0.001 for both parameters). On the other hand, they showed some features negatively related to thromboembolic risk; for example, they were younger (p < 0.001) and were more often male (p = 0.002). In addition, patients with abnormal BMIs were more likely to be smokers (p = 0.006) and to be treated with oral anticoagulants (p = 0.005). Despite these differences in the prevalence of thromboembolic risk factors, the incidence of LATs was not increased in patients with abnormal body weight (overweight and obese compared to normal-weight patients) in this large real-life cohort of AF/AFl patients. This is probably due to the balanced composition regarding the prevalence of positive and negative thromboembolic risk factors.

Structural Cardiac Abnormalities in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter and Myocardial Injury.

BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnT) is often increased in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter, portending a poor prognosis. The etiologies for these increases have not been systematically investigated. Our aim was to define prevalence/significance of structural cardiac abnormalities in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) increases. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter diagnosis with hs-cTnT measurements, echocardiograms, and coronary angiograms. Myocardial injury was defined as hs-cTnT >10 ng/L for women and >15 ng/L for men. Cases with myocardial injury were adjudicated according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. RESULTS: Patients with definite causes for increased hs-cTnT (n = 875) were tabulated but not evaluated further; common diagnoses were type 1 myocardial infarction, critical illness, and known heart failure. Of the remaining 401, increased hs-cTnT was present in 336 (84%) patients. Of those, 78% had nonischemic myocardial injury, the remaining (n = 75, 22%) had type 2 myocardial infarction. Patients with elevated hs-cTnT had greater left ventricular mass index, left ventricular filling pressures, and right ventricular systolic pressure. They more frequently had significant coronary artery disease (47% vs 31%, P = .016), especially in type 2 myocardial infarction. With logistic regression, age, sex (F), diabetes, left ventricular mass index, e' medial velocity, and right ventricular systolic pressure were independent determinants of myocardial injury. One-year mortality was higher in patients with myocardial injury. CONCLUSIONS: Structural heart abnormalities are common in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter and increased hs-cTnT. Causes of myocardial injury should be elucidated in each patient to craft appropriate therapies.

Electrical cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias with cardiac amyloidosis in the era of direct oral anticogulants.

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter is common during cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Electrical cardioversion (EC) is a strategy to restore sinus rhythm (SR). However, left atrial thrombus (LAT) represents a contraindication for EC. CA patients with AF/atrial flutter have a high prevalence of LAT. We aimed to evaluate EC characteristics, LAT prevalence and risk factors, and AF/atrial flutter outcome in CA patients undergoing EC, predominantly treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with CA and AF/atrial flutter referred for the first time to our national referral centre of amyloidosis for EC from June 2017 to February 2021 were included in this study. In total, 66 patients (median age 74.5 [70;80.75] years, 67% male) were included with anticoagulation consisted of DOAC in 74% of cases. All patients underwent cardiac imaging before EC to rule out LAT. EC was cancelled due to LAT in 14% of cases. Complete thrombus resolution was observed in only 17% of cases. The two independent parameters associated with LAT were creatinine [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.01; confidence interval (CI) = 1.00-1.03, P = 0.036] and the use of antiplatelet agents (HR = 13.47; CI = 1.85-98.02). EC acute success rate was 88%, and we observed no complication after EC. With 64% of patients under amiodarone, AF/atrial flutter recurrence rate following EC was 51% after a mean follow-up of 30 ± 27 months. CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial thrombus was observed in 14% of CA patients listed for EC and mainly treated with DOAC. The acute EC success rate was high with no complication. The long-term EC success rate was acceptable (49%).

Diagnosis and management of wide complex tachycardia in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: While wide complex tachycardia (WCT) is potentially lethal, little is known about its incidence in the ED or about expertise of ED physicians in diagnosing and treating it. We sought to compare WCT ED cases that were primary arrhythmias versus those with rapid heart rate secondary to medical issues, as well as the accuracy of ED diagnosis and appropriateness of treatment. METHODS: We conducted a health records review at a large academic hospital ED staffed by 95 physicians and included consecutive patients over 28 months (2018-2020) with WCT (heart rate ≥ 120 bpm and QRS ≥ 120 ms). Cases were adjudicated for the accuracy of ECG diagnosis versus the cardiology read and for correctness of treatment as per guidelines by two ED physicians and one cardiologist. RESULTS: We identified 306 eligible cases (0.2% of all ED visits): mean age 73.9 years, male 66.0%, admitted 53.3%, died in ED 2.3%. Primary arrhythmias and secondary tachycardias were each 50.0% (95% CI 44.4-55.6%). ED physicians correctly interpreted 81.2% of ECGs. The most common presenting arrythmias and % correct were: atrial fibrillation 42.7% (95.0%), atrial flutter 22.2% (63.5%), sinus tachycardia 12.0% (78.6%), and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) 11.1% (68.0%). Treatments were judged optimal in 84.3% of primary WCT and 86.9% in secondary WCT. Treatments were suboptimal for: inappropriate drug (3.9% for primary versus 1.3% for secondary), failure to reduce heart rate < 100 prior to discharge home (9.1% for primary versus 34.4% for secondary), and not treating the underlying cause in 5.9% of secondary WCT. CONCLUSIONS: WCT cases were evenly split between primary arrhythmias and secondary cases. ED physicians interpreted the ECG correctly in 81% but over-called atrial flutter and SVT. They implemented appropriate care in most cases but sometimes failed to adequately control heart rate or to treat the underlying condition, suggesting opportunities to improve care of WCT in the ED.

RéSUMé: INTRODUCTION: Bien que la tachycardie à complexe large (wide complex tachycardia WCT) soit potentiellement mortelle, on sait peu de choses sur son incidence aux urgences ou sur l'expertise des médecins des urgences en matière de diagnostic et de traitement. Nous avons cherché à comparer les cas WCT aux urgences qui étaient des arythmies primaires par rapport à ceux avec une fréquence cardiaque rapide secondaire à des problèmes médicaux, ainsi que la précision du diagnostic des urgences et la pertinence du traitement. MéTHODES: Nous avons effectué un examen des dossiers médicaux dans les urgences d'un grand hôpital universitaire où travaillent 95 médecins et avons inclus des patients consécutifs sur 28 mois (2018-2020) présentant un WCT (fréquence cardiaque ≥120 bpm et QRS ≥120 ms). Les cas ont été jugés par deux médecins des urgences et un cardiologue pour l'exactitude du diagnostic ECG par rapport à la lecture cardiologique et pour l'exactitude du traitement conformément aux directives. RéSULTATS: Nous avons identifié 306 cas éligibles (0,2 % de toutes les visites aux urgences) : âge moyen 73,9 ans, hommes 66,0 %, admis 53,3 %, décédés aux urgences 2,3 %. Les arythmies primaires et les tachycardies secondaires étaient chacune de 50,0 % (IC 95 % 44,4-55,6 %). Les médecins des urgences ont interprété correctement 81,2 % des ECG. Les arythmies les plus fréquentes et les pourcentages d'interprétation correcte étaient les suivants : fibrillation auriculaire 42,7 % (95,0 %), flutter auriculaire 22,2 % (63,5 %), tachycardie sinusale 12,0 % (78,6 %) et tachycardie supraventriculaire (TSV) 11,1 % (68,0 %). Les traitements ont été jugés optimaux dans 84,3 % des WCT primaires et 86,9 % des WCT secondaires. Les traitements étaient sous-optimaux pour les raisons suivantes : médicament inapproprié (3,9 % pour le primaire contre 1,3 % pour le secondaire), incapacité à réduire la fréquence <100 avant le retour à domicile (9,1 % pour le primaire contre 34,4 % pour le secondaire) et absence de traitement de la cause sous-jacente dans 5,9 % du WCT secondaire. CONCLUSIONS: Les cas de WCT étaient répartis uniformément entre les arythmies primaires et les cas secondaires. Les médecins du service d'urgence ont correctement interprété l'ECG dans 81 % des cas, mais ont surévalué le flutter auriculaire et la TSV. Ils ont mis en œuvre des soins appropriés dans la plupart des cas, mais n'ont pas toujours réussi à contrôler adéquatement la fréquence cardiaque ou à traiter la maladie sous-jacente, ce qui laisse entrevoir des possibilités d'améliorer les soins de WCT au service d'urgence.

Outcomes and mortality associated with atrial arrhythmias among patients hospitalized with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in the adult population. Herein, is a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the impact of AF/atrial flutter (AFL) on mortality, as well as individual complications in patients hospitalized with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A systematic search of the SCOPUS, Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL and Cochrane databases was performed. The a priori primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. A random-effects model was used to pool study results. RESULTS: Nineteen studies which included 33,296 patients were involved in this meta-analysis. Inhospital mortality for AF/AFL vs. no-AF/AFL groups varied and amounted to 32.8% vs. 14.2%, respectively (risk ratio [RR]: 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79-2.65; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality in new onset AF/AFL compared to no-AFAFL was 22.0% vs. 18.8% (RR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.54-2.24; p < 0.001). Intensive care unit (ICU) admission was required for 17.7% of patients with AF/AFL compared to 10.8% for patients without AF/AFL (RR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.04-3.62; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The present study reveals that AF/AFL is associated with increased in-hospital mortality and worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and may be used as a negative prognostic factor in these patients. Patients with AF/AFL are at higher risk of hospitalization in ICU. The presence of AF/AFL in individuals with COVID-19 is associated with higher risk of complications, such as bleeding, acute kidney injury and heart failure. AF/AFL may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to the hemodynamic compromise of cardiac function itself or hyperinflammatory state typical of these conditions.

Atrial Flutter Following Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy During Percutaneous Intervention of Left Anterior Descending Disease.

A 72-year-old woman undergoing percutaneous intervention to a calcified proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery lesion using Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (S-IVL) developed new atrial flutter. She then returned to sinus rhythm after treatment with amiodarone. S-IVL can cause cardiomyocyte depolarization. We hypothesize that pacing can occur during atrial repolarization, inducing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and even triggering atrial macro re-entrant circuits. We recommend synchronizing shock wave delivery with R waves on the electrocardiogram to lower the risk of arrhythmias.